IRinFive

Author: IRinFive

  • China's Economic Slowdown Causes Uncertainty in Europe

    07/21 – International News Story & Analysis

    As China’s economic slowdown continues, the governing Communist Party held its third plenum from July 15 to 18 to lay out future economic developments while Europe braces itself with uncertainty. 

    In the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, China’s economy has faltered with a shaky property market and decreased consumer spending, impacting European foreign investments. 

    At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the Chinese government attempted to crack down on indebted real estate developers to reduce risk to the financial system. This effort pushed housing prices down and weaker companies defaulted. 

    With a slowdown in the development of pre-paid homes, some homeowners stopped paying mortgages increasing the perceived uncertainty of property investments. 

    As of mid-2023, housing prices had fallen every month for more than a year and the declining value of homes seemed to negatively impact spending tendencies in China as people adopted a “save-over-spend” mentality. 

    In the first half of 2024, property investment fell 10.1% from a year earlier. Home sales by floor area declined by 19%. [Reuters]

    At the end of 2021, China’s exports peaked at a record $340 billion and the country took over as the world’s largest exporter of goods.

    All of this led to optimism at the start of 2023 that China would see a rapid recovery in consumer spending after the loosening of both global COVID-19 restrictions and China’s strict Zero Covid policy. 

    China’s growing tensions with the United States has also played a role in negative economic impact with increasing doubts about future access to technology, markets, and capital. Concerns over the potential for reduced feasibility of regular travel and engagement with the West have also been raised. 

    The structural slowdown of China’s economy has also been linked to China’s Deleveraging Campaign from 2013 to 2021 which aimed to expand credit and investment to reduce debt within the Chinese economy, particularly in the corporate and local government sectors. [CSIS]

    One such tactic under this campaign involved developers replacing one form of borrowing from shadow banks with revenues from sales of homes before their construction.

    When housing sales began declining, developers cut back on new land purchases and construction

    THIRD PLENUM

    Amid these economic challenges, China held its third plenum meeting from July 15-18 presided over by Chinese President Xi Jinping, head of the party’s Central Committee. 

    In all, there are 7 plenums with the first, second, and seventh focusing on power transitions between Central Committees. The fourth and sixth generally center around party ideology leaving the fifth for five-year development plans and the third to focus on long-term economic reforms. [Reuters]

    Following the closure of the third plenum meeting on July 18, the government reiterated China’s commitment to a “new development philosophy,” focused on “high-quality economic development” driven by “all-around innovation” as well as reaching its 5% annual growth target.

    The CCP has also shown signs of shifting away from its previous emphasis on raw growth driven by infrastructure investments. [The Diplomat]

    The official Chinese Xinhua News Agency reported after the meeting, “High-quality development is the top mission of building a modern socialist country.” [Bloomberg]

    IMPACT ON EUROPE

    In 2024 so far, China’s economy has continued its slowing trend which has only furthered uncertainty in Europe.

    China’s economy, the second-largest in the world, grew much slower than expected in the second quarter of 2024, growing by 4.7% from April to June, its slowest since the first quarter of 2023. [Reuters]

    By the end of 2024, the Chinese government is aiming for an economic growth target of around 5.0%, an ambitious target according to some analysts.

    This second-quarter growth slowdown prompted investment banking company Goldman Sachs to lower its forecast for China’s 2024 growth to 4.9% from 5.0%.

    The consumer sector has remained a major concern during the slowdown as retail sales hit an 18-month low, forcing businesses to cut prices on various products.

    In particular, luxury markets in Europe have been hit by China’s slowing economy and decreasing consumer demand. 

    The Stoxx luxury index, a stock market index that tracks the performance of the top European luxury goods companies was down 1.5% on July 15. [Market Watch]

    British fashion brand Burberry reported a quarterly sales decrease of 21% in China with Swiss watchmaker Swatch also reporting a decrease in sales due to weaker demand in China.

    Lynn Song, chief economist for Greater China at ING said: “A negative wealth effect from falling property and stock prices, as well as low wage growth amid various industries’ cost cutting, is dragging consumption and causing a pivot from big-ticket purchases toward the basic ‘eat, drink and play’ theme consumption,”

    In May the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China said that European companies operating in China are concerned that the slowdown will hurt their profitability.

    It also reported in its Business Confidence Survey that the outlook for doing business in China hit its lowest in the report’s 20-year history.

    In recent months the US and EU have also accused China of flooding global markets with cheap products to cope with industrial overcapacity. [Nikkei]

    Data on China’s inbound foreign direct investment showed a 26.1% decline for the January to March quarter, dampening prospects for a turnaround. [Nikkei 2]

    EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and French President Emmanuel Macron urged President Xi Jinping in May to ensure more balanced trade with Europe.

    Von der Leyen said at the talks in Paris that the European Union “cannot absorb massive over-production of Chinese industrial goods flooding its market,” [Reuters]

    Denis Depoux, global managing director of management consultancy Roland Berger said: “European companies are confronted by growing uncertainties in China, in large part due to economic volatility and less predictable policy direction,” 

    Opinion:

    It is becoming clear that popular Western fears of China overtaking the United States as the world’s top economy have proven exaggerated, with the U.S. still firmly in the lead for the foreseeable future. 

    China’s decades of growth largely resulted from the historic opening of their socialist economy, which spurred modernization and financial boom. However, as with all nations that experience significant economic runs, a slowdown and structural issues eventually emerge. 

    The ruling Communist Party remains committed to its authoritarian model, and necessary reforms to reignite economic development may lead them to double down on national security, limiting free-market development and foreign investment. 

    This could heighten tensions with the West, setting the stage for another global power rivalry between democracy and autocracy, where historically, democracy has often emerged victorious on the economic front. [The Diplomat

    Despite its slowing economy, China’s dominant role in the global economy is undeniable. They lead economically in their region, and a declining Chinese economy will impact the development of its Asian neighbors. 

    The European Union faces its own challenges, particularly with China as its second-largest trading partner and the EU being China’s largest trading partner. [EEAS

    The European Union will have to deal with its own reliability issues amidst an economically stagnating Chinese— and not to mention the looming potential of an increasingly protectionist United States on the horizon.

    This EU-China relationship is becoming more antagonist as of late, as a stagnating China has led to more economic malpractices from the Xi regime which has invited condemnation from the European commission. Top EU and NATO leaders have also recently publicly condemned China’s foreign policy actions and economic enabling of Putin’s war of aggression in Ukraine. 

    As China’s economy slows, European companies with operations or production bases in China are increasingly worried and may begin exiting the country. This stagnation, coupled with a potential trade war with the West, could create uncertainty in European economies heavily reliant on trade with China. 

    Germany will be particularly important to monitor, as the EU’s largest economy grapples with recent financial turmoil. For the past eight years, China was Germany’s largest trading partner, until being overtaken by the United States this year. [Reuters]

    European governments, including Germany, will need to engage in serious discussions about their economic ties and dependence on the People’s Republic of China. As the economic prowess of the Chinese begins to show signs of decline, these discussions will be crucial in addressing the ripple effects on international trade.

    – K.M./P.T.

  • Trump Names J.D. Vance as VP Running Mate

    07/16 – International News Update

    Former President Donald Trump announced his choice of running mate on July 15, picking Ohio Senator J.D. Vance.

    Trump made the announcement on his social media network Truth Social, saying: “After lengthy deliberation and thought, and considering the tremendous talents of many others, I have decided that the person best suited to assume the position of Vice President of the United States is Senator J.D. Vance of the Great State of Ohio.”

    Soon after the announcement Vance received a formal nomination from the Republican party at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

    The choice of vice presidential candidate is somewhat interesting given that Vance himself was once a strong critic of Trump during the beginning of his political career and during his presidential campaign against Hillary Clinton in 2016. 

    In the past Vance had dubbed Trump  “a total fraud,” “a moral disaster” and “America’s Hitler.”

    However, his tone has changed over the years to staunch support for the former president which Vance says was due to Trump’s performance in office.

    In 2021, Vance apologized for his criticism of Trump in an interview with Fox News. Last month, he told Fox “Look, I was wrong about Donald Trump. I didn’t think he was going to be a good president,” Adding:”He was a great president, and it’s one of the reasons why I’m working so hard to make sure he gets a second term.”[Fox News]

    In 2022, Vance landed a seat in the US Senate representing Ohio after being endorsed by Trump.

    In the wake of an assassination attempt on Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, Vance wrote on the social media platform X accusing President Joe Biden’s campaign of inciting the violence. 

    He wrote: “The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs.” He added: “That rhetoric led directly to President Trump’s attempted assassination.”

    With the upcoming Presidential election in November, midwestern states are expected to play a critical role in swaying the turnout. 

    In Trump’s announcement of Vance as his VP pick, he wrote that Vance “will be strongly focused on the people he fought so brilliantly for, the American Workers and Farmers in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Minnesota, and far beyond,” in an appeal to midwestern voters. 

    In response to Trump’s announcement nominating Vance, Biden’s campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon said in a statement: “Donald Trump picked J.D. Vance as his running mate because Vance will do what Mike Pence wouldn’t on January 6: bend over backwards to enable Trump and his extreme MAGA agenda, even if it means breaking the law and no matter the harm to the American people,” [AP News]

    The statement was made in reference to an insurrection made by a pro-Trump mob in the US Capitol Building on January 6 2021 following Trump’s loss in the 2020 presidential election. 

    Meanwhile, President Biden wrote on X: “Here’s the deal about J.D. Vance. He talks a big game about working people. But now, he and Trump want to raise taxes on middle-class families while pushing more tax cuts for the rich.”

    If Trump wins in the November election, Vance will be the second youngest vice president, tied with Richard Nixon. Vance’s vacant Senate seat would be filled by Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, a moderate Republican. [Politico

    Opinion: 

    Leading up to this week’s Republican National Convention, speculation about who Donald Trump would select as his hopeful Vice President had been swirling for months. 

    Trump’s VP shortlist included names such as North Dakota Governor Doug Bergum, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, South Carolina Senator Tim Scott, New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, and Florida Congressman Byron Donalds.  [AP News

    Ultimately, Trump chose 39-year-old Ohio Senator J.D. Vance, who the media had tipped as the most likely candidate.

    Similar to his 2016 campaign, Trump’s VP choice is clearly made on tactical grounds concerning campaign strategy. His previous running mate, Indiana Governor Mike Pence, was chosen to court evangelical Christian voters. [BBC]

    This time, in 2024, Trump selected the up-and-coming young senator J.D. Vance from Ohio, a crucial swing state in the November race. This selection demonstrates Trump’s perceived importance of securing votes from industrial Midwestern battleground states, which will likely decide the upcoming presidential election.

    Vance’s background will help Trump focus on courting the demographic of working-class voters. 

    Vance’s initial rise to popularity came through his personal memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy,” published in 2016. The memoir explains his blue-collar upbringing and how it influenced his worldview and inspiring rise into national politics. [BBC]

    Vance appeals to average, lower, and working-class Americans through his own lived experience of the “American Dream,” rising from nothing to become a successful and prominent national civil servant. He also holds an accredited Ivy League law degree and has served in the military.

    Although initially an avid “anti-Trumper” during Trump’s first presidential bid in 2016, Vance has since become an outspoken defender of the former President, garnering the support of both Trump and his supporters. He holds similar views on notable policy issues as President Trump, including trade, immigration, foreign policy, and the war in Ukraine. [BBC

    At this point in the presidential campaign race, Trump’s choice for running mate makes sense when considering these factors and the possible choices leading up to the RNC. 

    Should Trump win in November and return to the White House, J.D. Vance’s role as Vice President, along with his age and political alignment, will likely make him the prospective heir to the MAGA throne and the Republican presidential nomination in 2028. 

    K.M./P.T.

  • Trump Survives Assassination Attempt

    07/15 – International News Story & Update

    On Saturday, July 13, shots rang out at a Trump campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, leaving former President Donald J. Trump injured. 

    Trump was shot at multiple times, with one bullet striking him in the right ear. [Reuters

    The bullet that struck Trump was only an inch from hitting his brain, and had the President not turned his head away from the crowd only a split second before, the former President would not be alive today. 

    In an exclusive interview given to the New York Post, Trump recounted the event, stating, “I’m not supposed to be here, I’m supposed to be dead.” [The Independent]   

    This incident marks the most serious attack on a former or current president since Ronald Reagan was shot and wounded in March 1981. [The Economist]

    The shooter has been identified as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks from Pennsylvania. His political affiliations are unclear, as records show he is a registered Republican who has previously donated to Democratic groups and campaigns. [ABC News

    Crooks used an AR-15 from a rooftop about a football field-length away from the stage, firing multiple shots at the former President and grazing his ear. Crooks was shot and killed by a Secret Service counter-sniper within three seconds of opening fire on Trump. 

    The attack also claimed the life of 50-year-old former fire chief Corey Comperatore, who was shielding his family in the crowd, reports AP News. Two other bystanders were seriously injured in the incident. [AP News]

    An investigation has been launched and is ongoing to uncover more details about the planned assassination. The direct motives of the shooter remain unknown.

    International Reactions 

    The shooting of Donald Trump generated a wave of international response, with numerous world leaders condemning the attempted murder of the former President.

    “I’m sickened by the shooting at former President Trump. “It cannot be overstated – political violence is never acceptable. My thoughts are with former President Trump, those at the event, and all Americans.” – Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau 

    “I am appalled by the shocking scenes at President Trump’s rally and we send him and his family our best wishes. Political violence in any form has no place in our societies and my thoughts are with all the victims of this attack.” – U.K. Prime Minister, Keir Starmer 

    “The attack on US presidential candidate Donald Trump is despicable. My thoughts are also with all of those who were affected by the attack. Such acts of violence threaten democracy.” – German Chancellor, Olaf Scholz 

    “The desperation of the international left, which today sees its nefarious ideology expiring, is not surprising. In panic of losing at the polls, they resort to terrorism to impose their backward and authoritarian agenda.” – Argentinian President, Javier Milei 

    “Violence has no place in politics and democracies. Our thoughts and prayers are with the family of the deceased, those injured and the American people.” – Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi 

    “This wasn’t just an attack on Donald Trump. This was an attack on a candidate for the presidency of the United States. This was an attack on America. It was an attack on democracy.” – Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu 

    “An attempt on the life of Donald Trump, a heinous crime. One that can only be condemned, and which shows how serious the global challenges to democracy are right now. Violence in any form and anywhere must not prevail.” – Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy 

    The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement claiming they are “following the shooting incident” and that Xi Jinping has “expressed sympathies to former President Trump” [U.S. News

    A Kremlin spokesperson issued a statement saying ““We do not believe that the attempt to eliminate and assassinate Trump was organized by the current authorities. But the atmosphere around candidate Trump provoked what America is confronting today.” [U.S. News]

    The spokesman also said there were no plans for Putin to call Trump in connection with the incident. [Reuters]

    Opinion: 

    The immediate reaction to the assassination attempt displayed the prevalence of misinformation and conspiracy theories. The Left claims it to be a staged set-up to sway public opinion and garner support. Meanwhile, many on the Right believe it to be an inside job due to the security breach and Secret Service misjudgment, as well as the astonishing lack of vulnerability for a former President.

    Overall, the entire country should feel extremely fortunate that Trump’s life was not taken on live television. Such an event would have undoubtedly plunged our nation into absolute chaos, with protests and riots likely to have ensued. The likelihood of counter-violence and a response from Trump supporters would have been dangerously high, throwing the highly contentious and consequential November election into utter plight. 

    Both parties and the entire country feel the urgent need to lower political tensions as polarization has reached a clear and evident boiling point. Political violence should never be a characteristic of American democracy, and it is extremely alarming to see this trend emerging more frequently over the last few years.

    Former President Trump should make it clear in his first public speech about the attack, likely at this week’s Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, that no one should retaliate or seek vengeance in his name by any means. He must emphasize, as his presidential opponent should, that political violence has absolutely no place in any democracy, especially in the United States. 

    In light of the recent incident, the Biden campaign has temporarily taken down Democratic ads openly criticizing Trump. This reaction follows a public address to the nation on Sunday by President Joe Biden, who condemned the attack and emphasized the need for national unity and to “lower the temperature in our politics.” [The Guardian]

    This shocking event has thrown the Democratic presidential campaign into short-term disarray. Both President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris canceled and postponed planned speeches for early this week. 

    It is clear that following the solemn mood surrounding Saturday’s attack, the Biden team is now forced to pivot away from outright criticism of former President Trump. 

    Both Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have labeled Trump as an “existential threat” and the biggest possible danger to the future of American democracy. [Vox]

    It is hard not to attach some blame to this aggressive rhetoric in light of the recent attempt on the former President’s life. 

    It will be interesting to see how the Biden campaign adapts after a terrible few weeks, including an abysmal debate performance and ongoing calls from senior Democrats for his resignation from the nomination.

    With Donald Trump now surviving an assassination attempt, public opinion will likely shift in his favor as we approach November’s election. Meanwhile, Biden’s campaign and chances of reelection seem shakier and less likely than ever.

    – P.T.

  • NATO Summit Concludes: Key Stories

    07/12 – International News Updates

    Here are IRinFive’s main updates and takeaways following this week’s historic 75th anniversary NATO Summit that took place in Washington DC. 

    New Military Aid Packages:

    • U.S. will deploy long-range missiles to Germany in 2026

    • NATO allies will send dozens of air defense systems to Ukraine, including four highly sought after American Patriot Systems 

    • F-16 fighter jets will be deployed to Ukraine for first time and after over a year of pleads from Zelenskyy

    • Jens Stoltenberg wraps up his ten-year term as Secretary General of NATO; receives Presidential Medal of Freedom from Joe Biden 

    • Bloc support for Ukraine and a collective commitment to ensuring their path to alliance membership 

    • Joint Communique outlining at least 40 billion euros in aid for Ukraine 

    Leaders: 

    • UK PM Keir Starmer dismisses doubts over Biden’s cognitive capabilities and their nascent relationship is characterized by friendly remarks.

    • Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan accuses Biden and the US of being complicit in Israeli war crimes in Gaza, questioning international law if a nation like the US does nothing about what he deems inexcusable in Palestine. 

    • NATO member Turkey has denounced Israel’s assault on Gaza, halted trade with it, and voiced support for Hamas. Erdogan has repeatedly criticized Western countries for backing Israel and called for Israel to be punished by international courts. Last month, he expressed his nation’s solidarity with Lebanon amidst rising tensions and the potential for a wider regional war between Israel and Iranian-backed militia Hezbollah.

    • “We are an unwavering NATO ally. However, we do not believe that this impedes our ability to establish positive relationships with nations such as China and Russia,” Erdogan told Newsweek. [Reuters]

    • U.S. President Joe Biden gave a solo speech towards the end of the summit, where he cordially handed off the stage to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, mistakenly introducing him as “President Putin” before correcting himself. 

    • European leaders defended him afterwards, with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz both reiterating that slips of the tongue are normal and “happen to everyone.” Ah yes, that certainly seems to be the case with good ‘ol Joe.

    • Following NATO’s announcement of a common stance supporting a path to Ukrainian accession, Slovakian PM Robert Fico publicly expressed his dismay over the decision. 

    • Fico emphasized his concerns by stating, “I understand Ukraine’s wishes, it is a sovereign country, but Ukraine’s membership in NATO is just a guarantee of World War III.” [Politico]

    • Fico has remained one of Europe’s main leaders against providing military aid to Ukraine and has downplayed the severity of the conflict. 

    • He also voiced support for Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s recent attempts at acting as a rogue diplomatic peacemaker, stating that he “would have liked very much to have joined him” in his recent meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. [Politico

    • Orban’s sporadic visits to Ukraine, Russia, China, and now the United States for this week’s NATO summit have generated significant criticism from most EU leaders, many of whom claim that Orban does not diplomatically represent the bloc despite his current role as rotating President of the EU Council. In contrast, Slovakia’s leader Robert Fico is notable for his open praise of the Hungarian PM’s efforts. 

    China: 

    • A draft communique from the summit took notable shots at China, labeling the country as an enabler of Russia’s war effort in Ukraine due to their ongoing trade relations and third-party undermining of Western sanctions.

    • The resolution called on China to cease all support for Russia’s war effort against Ukraine. The alliance’s draft communique further claims that Beijing continues to pose systemic challenges to European security. [Reuters

    • China’s foreign ministry responded to these accusations as mere smears and lies, claiming that the resolution was “biased and “sowing discord”. [AP News]

    • The PRC’s spokesperson, Lin Jin, stated that these claims are belligerent provocations and NATO’s way of shifting blame rather than taking concrete action to try and end the war in Ukraine. He asserted that “China’s core position on the Ukraine issue is to promote peace talks and a political settlement, which has been widely recognized and appreciated by the international community.” [Reuters]

    • Hungary’s representatives also openly opposed these condemnations of China, with Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto emphasizing that Hungary does not want NATO to become an “anti-China bloc”. 

    • He further highlighted that China is an important trade and investment partner for Hungary.

    • This contrasts with many other European member states that are trying to divest and shift economic dependence away from China. Hungary’s government has also doubled down on their opposition to the bloc’s dedication to Ukrainian NATO membership. With fears of direct confrontation and escalation with Russia, Hungary has maintained this divergent position throughout the conflict. 

    • “Ukraine’s admission wouldn’t strengthen but weaken the alliance’s unity, as there are completely different viewpoints on their membership,” Szijjarto said. [Reuters]

    • NATO boss Jens Stoltenberg doubled down on his antagonization of China later in the summit when commenting on recent joint military exercises between China and Belarus.

    • Stoltenberg expressed concerns over China’s increasing levels of cooperation with Russia and Belarus, claiming that the East Asian power is moving closer and closer to NATO on basically every continent.

    • He even labeled the PRC as an authoritarian regime and openly criticized the nation’s treatment towards their neighbors and own population.

    • “We are speaking about authoritarian regimes. China is oppressing its own people, cracking down on democratic voices … in Hong Kong, more assertive behavior in the South China Sea, threatening neighbors, threatening Taiwan”, stated Stoltenberg. [Politico]

    – P.T.

  • Electric Vehicle Battles Escalate China’s Trade War with the West

    07/11 – International Economy News Story

    In the ongoing trade war between the West and China, a new battlefront has emerged over electric vehicles (EVs). 

    In May, the United States imposed a 100% duty on Chinese EVs as part of broader measures against Chinese tech. On July 2, Canada launched a consultation on “unfair Chinese trade practices” in the EV industry. Two days later, the European Union enacted a provisional tariff of 37.6% on Chinese EVs. On July 10, China’s Ministry of Commerce indicated it would investigate whether the EU’s tariffs create barriers to free trade, signaling its intention to retaliate. [The Economist]

    Western car manufacturers with significant operations in China fear becoming collateral damage in this conflict. Chinese government agencies have already been directed to remove American-made software and hardware from firms like IBM, Microsoft, and Oracle, citing national security concerns. [The Economist]

    Valdis Dombrovskis, the EU’s top trade official, dismissed concerns of retaliation from Beijing after the European Commission imposed tariffs on Chinese EVs ranging from 17.4% to 37.6%. These tariffs, lower than the US’s 100% duty, supplement the existing 10% duty on Chinese EV imports. [The Guardian]

    After an eight-month investigation, the European Commission found that companies making electric cars in China benefit from substantial government support, allowing them to undercut EU rivals on price, gain significant market share, and threaten European jobs. [AP News]

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed concerns about job losses due to these imbalances during her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. China has signaled potential tit-for-tat measures, investigating French cognac and pork imports over subsidies. [The Guardian]

    The Chinese commerce ministry accused the West of escalating trade frictions. 

    The customs duties will be provisional, meaning they will be totaled up but won’t need to be paid until confirmed by a vote of EU governments before November 2. They were announced on June 12 and will go into effect this Friday. [AP News]

    The EU will only collect the duties if it finds that the European auto industry would have suffered material harm without them. This timeline gives the EU and the Chinese government time to negotiate, with talks already held between Valdis Dombrovskis, the EU commissioner for the economy, and Chinese Trade Minister Wang Wentao.

    China has rapidly gained a 25% share of the EU market for electric battery-powered cars, up from 3% in 2020. EU officials fear without action, Europe’s EV industry, which employs millions, could be severely harmed. 

    Importers of Chinese vehicles will now provide bank guarantees to cover the new duties, pending a final decision on permanent tariffs in the autumn. Provisional tariffs for BYD are set at 17.4%, Geely at 19.9%, and SAIC at 37.6%. Despite opposition from Germany, the tariffs will likely remain, requiring a weighted majority of 15 EU member states to overturn. [The Guardian]

    The Biden administration is raising tariffs on Chinese EVs to 100% from the current 25%, effectively blocking nearly all Chinese EV imports. In contrast, Europe’s planned tariffs are aimed at leveling the playing field by approximating the size of the subsidies available to Chinese carmakers, rather than blocking imports entirely. [AP News

    EU officials argue that while affordable electric cars from abroad are necessary to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals, they should not come at the cost of fair competition.

    The trade war over EVs between the West and China continues to escalate, with significant implications for global trade and the automotive industry. As both sides maneuver for advantage, the impacts on international markets and geopolitical relations remain uncertain. 

    Opinion: 

    China is now in a peculiar position. On one hand, China must appear firm against accusations of flooding markets with subsidized products. On the other hand, with a slowing economy, China wants to signal openness to foreign investment. China might opt for a measured response, possibly imposing export restrictions on crucial minerals like gallium and germanium, essential for electronics in EVs.

    The rapid growth of Chinese EV manufacturers has sparked fears that these Chinese cars will threaten the EU’s ability to produce its own green technology and jeopardize the jobs of 2.5 million workers in the auto industry and 10.3 million more people indirectly dependent on EV production. Flashbacks to the EU’s experience with subsidized Chinese solar panels wiping out European producers has heightened these concerns.

    The impact of these duties on car prices remains uncertain. Chinese carmakers might absorb the duties through lower profits instead of raising prices. While consumers might benefit from cheaper Chinese cars in the short term, allowing unfair practices could eventually reduce competition and increase prices. 

    Currently, Chinese carmakers often sell their vehicles in Europe at higher prices than in China, focusing on profits over market share. However, there is a fear that Chinese competitors might lower their prices to increase their market share in Europe.

    Beijing has sharply criticized the higher duties, calling them “a naked act of protectionism.” [AP News

    The Chinese Commerce Ministry has noted that several rounds of technical consultations have been held and hopes for a mutually acceptable solution. China could retaliate against European products and luxury imports. 

    Over the longer term, Chinese carmakers might try and avoid tariffs by manufacturing cars in Europe, with BYD building a plant in Hungary and Chery planning a joint venture to build cars in Spain’s Catalonia region. [AP News

    These developments could be intriguing as the commercial tit-for-tat will heavily depend on the outward stances of EU member states towards the PRC and the perceived instability it could cause. 

    Currently, it is evident that the bloc is not entirely unified in its suspicions and diplomatic relationship with China. The progression and diversity of opinions on the national and economic security threat posed by China will shape the potential future escalation of the developing trade war between the East Asian power and the broader Western world.

    – P.T.

  • Biden Aims to Promote Unity at NATO Summit in DC

    07/10 – International News Update

    Washington, DC – At the NATO Summit celebrating the alliance’s 75th anniversary, President Joe Biden delivered a speech confidently declaring positive assertions for Ukraine’s victory in the ongoing war and the determination to halt Putin’s advances.

    “Today NATO is stronger than it’s ever been in its history,” Biden asserted. [Reuters

    Ukraine aims to increase pressure on the Biden administration during this week’s summit, pushing for the removal of restrictions on using American-supplied weapons in Russian territory. 

    Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, revealed in an interview with POLITICO that Ukraine seeks permission to deploy longer-range Army Tactical Missile Systems for strikes inside Russia. [Politico

    Currently, Ukraine uses these weapons in Crimea but wants U.S. approval to launch them from other areas.While the U.S. granted limited permission in May for strikes near Kharkiv, the White House has prohibited using long-range missiles against targets deep within Russia. 

    The U.S. remains cautious, fearing such strikes could provoke Russian President Vladimir Putin to escalate the conflict. However, Yermak argues that these concerns should not overshadow Ukraine’s need to retaliate effectively against Russian aggression.

    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stated that he expects NATO leaders to agree on a substantial new aid package for Ukraine. Results from the summit are likely to include advanced air-defense equipment, new military training centers, and more than sixty F-16 fighter jets. [The Economist

    A primary goal of the summit is to ensure Ukraine remains on an expected and “irreversible” path to NATO membership. Additionally, the U.S. decided to deploy long-range missiles to Germany by 2026, marking the first stationing of such weapons since the Cold War, sending a clear message to Putin.

    This is also an open and confirmatory violation of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty signed by the U.S. and Soviet Union in the late 80s, a mutual agreement to minimize and deplete their arsenals of intermediate and short range land missiles. 

    The treaty collapsed in 2019 due to U.S. claims of continued Russian violations. 

    The stationing of long range ICBMs in Germany displays a clear message to Putin, as this caliber of American weapons being stationed on the continent has not occurred since the Cold War [Reuters]

    Opinion: 

    President Joe Biden appears to be focusing on foreign policy as his presidency progresses. He is likely to continue emphasizing his robust military support and funding for Ukraine, especially following his poor performance in a recent debate against presidential election opponent, Donald Trump. 

    Biden’s approval ratings have dropped, and concerns about his cognitive ability to serve another term are at an all-time high, with several Democratic members of Congress calling for him to step down from the nomination.

    With the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, NATO’s role is under intense scrutiny, particularly given Donald Trump’s critiques and his questionable commitment to NATO. These concerns have already shaken alliance members, leading to an 18% increase in defense spending among allies this year.  [Politico

    Part of this increase might be an effort to “Trump-proof” the alliance, though political and geographic factors also play a significant role in spending habits.

    For countries bordering Russia, such as the Baltic states and Poland, fortifying defense systems and maintaining a strong commitment to NATO is crucial. Poland, for example, has allocated 4% of its annual GDP to defense spending, with President Andrzej Duda calling for allies to raise the target spending percentage to 3% of annual GDP. [Politico

    In contrast, smaller nations farther from Russia have less justification and incentive to meet the annual GDP percent requirement on defense.

    Europe’s security is fragile, and the threat posed by Russian aggression will likely lead to increased focus and spending on national security and defense. The potential for a second Trump term adds to the unpredictability, prompting European NATO leaders to strive for unity and heightened attention on stopping Russia and defending Ukraine as the war escalates.

    To promote stability and counter the unpredictability of a potential NATO future under Trump, Biden will likely assert that the United States will remain a leading protector of the alliance. He will contrast this with the image of Trump as an unpredictable wildcard who could destabilize Europe and appease Putin. 

    The Biden administration has repeatedly surpassed previous limits on military support for Ukraine, with President Volodymyr Zelensky urging the U.S. to allow deeper strikes into Russian territory. 

    They remain hesitant on this move as it will almost certainly provoke a sharp response and further escalation from Russian President Vladimir Putin. Many leaders even fear an expansion of the war that leads to direct confrontation between Russia and NATO. 

    Biden’s steadfast support for Ukraine and its resilience against Russian aggression remains one of his few avenues for garnering additional campaign support, as he continues to face calls for his resignation ahead of the upcoming November election.

    – P.T.

  • Britain Goes Left in Historic Electoral Landslide

    07/09 – International News Story and Update

    Last week, on July 4, Britain’s voters ousted the Conservative party out of power in an unprecedented defeat. 

    The U.K. Labour party won a decisive majority in the House of Commons with 411 seats out of the total 650 parliamentary member seats. [Politico]

    The Conservative party which has maintained a tumultuous 14-year run in power, lost an astounding 250 seats, now holding only 121 seats following electoral results. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who held the post since 2022, handed in his resignation 

    This was notably Britain’s second-lowest voting turnout in the last 100 years. Many British voters turned away from the two major parties that have dominated UK politics for the last century, with the centrist Liberal Democrats and far-right Reform UK party recording notable electoral gains. [Vox

    Labour won a decisive victory in parliamentary seats, but the national popular vote paints a distinctly nuanced image of what actual support looks like for each party. 

    Labour came out on top, but with only about 34% of the popular vote. The Conservatives came in second with 23.6% of the popular vote, their lowest in decades and a 20-point drop from the previous election in 2019. And the far-right Reform UK party accumulated a striking 14.3% of the popular vote. [Sky News

    Following the results of last Thursday’s election, Rishi Sunak handed in his apologetic resignation as Prime Minister on July 5. 

    In his final address outside 10 Downing Street, Sunak addressed the British public: “I have heard your anger, your disappointment and I take responsibility for this loss.” [Reuters]

    Sunak has also stepped down as leader of the Conservative party. 

    The leader of the Labour party, Keir Starmer, has now been appointed Prime Minister and is currently forming his cabinet around him. 

    Opinion: 

    Britain’s voters are desperate for change. The Conservative “Tories” have held power in Parliament for nearly a decade and a half, with little to show for it in the public’s eyes. 

    The UK has had enough and is ready to give Labour a shot at governing.

    This significant triumph for the center-left UK Labour party is not so much a sign of large-scale support for their political agenda but more a frustrated reaction to long-term Conservative rule and popular disillusionment with their administrations’ incompetence. 

    Voters have largely attributed rising insecurity, the cost of living, and economic stagnation since Brexit in 2016 to the Tories’ unfulfilled promises. This was compounded by botched responses to COVID and corruption scandals involving former PM Boris Johnson, followed by his incapable and unwilling successor, Liz Truss, who lasted less than 50 days as Prime Minister.

    Sunak seemed out of touch and unable to connect with voters. He lacked any genuine popular base and was seen more as a technocrat simply ushered in to add to his prestigious resume. 

    Sunak made the questionable decision to call for elections back in May, seeing as he had to do so before the end of the year. This early call surprised many, including his own party members, leaving the Conservatives scrambling for campaign momentum that they ultimately couldn’t muster. 

    Rishi Sunak and his party were unprepared for this election, which he called prematurely, resulting in a crushing political defeat.

    The final nail in the coffin of public appeal was Sunak’s lack of consideration and awareness, as he was caught leaving the 80th anniversary D-Day commemoration in Northern France on June 6.  [AP News]

    Starmer is not necessarily the most appealing new leader, often labeled as ‘dull and boring,’ but voters were ready to give him a chance if it meant kicking the Tories out. Most voters likely did not like any of their choices, despite the landslide victory for Starmer and his Labour colleagues.

    Overall, last week’s general elections demonstrated UK citizens’ overwhelming frustrations and lack of trust in the system, with a surge in anti-incumbency, muddled popular voting results, and a noticeably low turnout.

    – P.T.

  • Left Pull Off Shock Upset Over Far Right in French Election

    07/08 – International News Update

    France’s second round of snap national elections concluded on July 7, resulting in a surprising outcome where the country’s leftist coalition secured the most parliamentary seats, contrary to earlier predictions of a rightwing victory.

    Following losses by President Macron’s centrist Renaissance party in the June 9 European Parliament elections, Macron called for two rounds of snap legislative elections, scheduled for June 30 and July 7. 

    These elections were originally planned for 2027, coinciding with the next presidential elections. The decision to hold early elections was influenced by calls from the National Rally’s leader, Jordan Bardella, and others for early parliamentary elections. In a televised address on June 9, Macron stated, “I have heard your message,” and added, “I am giving you the choice of your legislative future by voting.”

    France’s right wing has gained popularity in recent years, with the far-right National Rally party, formerly led by Marine Le Pen, leading in opinion polls. The party has taken strong stances on immigration, with its new leader since 2022, Jordan Bardella, promising to cut taxes on fuel and electricity, tackle immigration, and address security issues. [NPR]

    Leading up to the final round of elections, Macron’s centrist Renaissance party was polling in third place, behind the National Rally and the leftist coalition, the New Popular Front. The first round of elections on June 30 saw the National Rally party in the lead.

    According to the latest report by Le Monde, the results of the July 7 vote left the New Popular Front with 182 seats, Macron’s centrist coalition Ensemble with 168 seats, and Le Pen’s National Rally in third place with 143 seats. [Le Monde]

    No party was able to achieve the 289-seat majority needed to control the French National Assembly. [Politico]

    The current Prime Minister, Gabriel Attal, has announced that he will step down following the result. President Macron will now seek to appoint a new prime minister in parliament, a role that typically goes to a member of the party with the parliamentary majority. 

    Jean-Luc Mélenchon, head of the far-left France Unbowed party, demanded that Macron choose a prime minister from the New Popular Front coalition, stating, “The president has the power and the duty to call the New Popular Front to govern. It is ready.” 

    Meanwhile, Bardella criticized the “unnatural alliance” between Macron and the leftists, claiming it was an attempt to stop National Rally’s significant surge in popularity.

    Opinion:

    Voters have spoken and as no one party was able to secure a majority, France now has a hung and divided parliament. This will usher in a period of uncertainty and political gridlock throughout France. [Reuters]

    The defeat of the right-wing National Rally is a surprising outcome, considering their impressive performance in the European Parliament elections, a majority of domestic opinion polls, and a comfortable lead following the first round of elections the previous week.

    Voter turnout was notably high, reflecting the public’s concerns. The real prospect of the right-wing taking legislative power in the French parliament likely generated widespread fear, motivating many to vote.

    Many political leaders and prominent figures pushed for resistance against the far right, utilizing social media to stoke fears about what a far-right victory could mean for citizens. Some politicians even stepped down from certain seats, and last-minute alliances among left-wing parties in Parliament led to the formation of the New Popular Front coalition, which ultimately finished first.

    Realizing the far right’s growing influence, many politicians and parties took swift measures to curb their victory. 

    As a result of the election, Macron’s domestic influence is weakened, with his centrist party unable to maintain a majority. He has indicated that he will remain in office for the remainder of his presidential term, showing reluctant signs of outright teaming up with the far Left.

    Despite their significant gains in recent years by capturing dissent over the cost of living crisis, degradation of public services, and inadequate immigration policies, the National Rally still lacks sufficient trust and a large enough popular base.

    The future of the Fifth Republic will be interesting to observe as it affects their support leading into the 2027 presidential elections. While Le Pen will be the candidate for the Right, she might still be too radical and disliked for enough voters to rally behind. However, with years of political turmoil, confusion, and domestic inefficiency on the horizon, it will be intriguing to see if further disillusionment with the establishment sparks a resurgent right-wing outcry in the next election.

    The National Rally’s gains this year are undeniable, and the continued rise of Le Pen’s protégé, 28-year-old Jordan Bardella, could alter the ticket come 2027. A young, well-spoken, and charismatic figure, Bardella’s appeal could be more scalable for the National Rally. 

    Although this scenario remains unlikely for now, if Bardella, who will be 31 by then, continues to garner support for the RN party over the next few years and domestic political issues worsen, we could very well see a shift in party dynamics and presidential hopefuls at France’s next political crossroad.

    – K.M./P.T.

  • Iran Elects Moderate, Western-leaning President

    07/07 – International News Story and Update

    Following their runoff presidential election on July 5, Iranian voters elected Masoud Pezeshkian as the Islamic Republic’s new president. 

    A relative moderate and former heart surgeon, Pezeshkian came out victorious in the runoff election with 16.4 million votes, beating out conservative hardliner Saeed Jahlili, who was only able to amount 13.5 million votes. [Politico]

    This election was called due to the unexpected death of Iran’s previous president, Ebrahim Raisi, in a helicopter crash back in May. [AP News

    This result comes after the initial round of the presidential election on June 28 saw Iran’s lowest voter turnout in history. [Politico

    Pezeshkian was able to defeat hardline opponents who look to enforce conservative Islamic codes throughout society and usually enjoy the backing of theocratic Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 

    Mr. Pezeshkian, on the other hand, managed to capture the popular outcry of recent years by advocating for women’s rights and a possible new nuclear deal with the U.S.

    The reformist claims he will work towards a reformed relationship with the West in order to reduce sanctions and improve Iran’s global isolation and recent economic turmoil as their currency value dwindles. [The Economist]

    Opinion:

    This can certainly be seen as a signal of hope for Iran. 

    Amidst heightened regional tensions with the Islamic government’s proxy militias engaging in violence throughout the Middle East, and an economy unlikely to improve without easing sanctions, Iranians are calling for change. This is evident through recent waves of protests and popular demonstrations against authoritarian brutality, particularly targeting the regime’s morality police. [BBC

    Many of the recent protests aim to reform the republic’s repressive dress codes and the overall oppressive treatment of women. Pezeshkian channeled this anger throughout his campaign, expressing opposition to the restrictive hijab dress code for women and dismay for the unlawful killing of 22 year-old Mahsa Amini at the hands of the morality police for not wearing a hijab in 2022. [Amnesty International]

    It is quite a statement from the public to choose Pezeshkian and his relatively progressive politics over the other hardliners on the ballot.

    What might be even more surprising is that the theocratic Supreme Leader Khamenei did not interfere with his appointment. Iran’s powerful clergy has previously erased the presence and prospects of independent and reformist candidates, either turning them into puppets or eliminating them outright. [The Economist]

    The fact that a political figure openly opposed to the hardline conservative candidates pushing for increased Islamization will assume the presidency could indicate that Iran’s supreme council has received the message from their people. The Supreme Leader might be allowing Pezeshkian’s presidency to maintain the political legitimacy of his theocratic regime. However, the reality of Iran’s unique political system and distribution of power means that Pezeshkian will face a very difficult and restrained presidency.

    To ease sanctions, he would need to improve relations with the United States, which would almost certainly require increased restraint on their militant proxies invoking conflict in places like Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, and more. This is central to Iran’s foreign policy and likely beyond his control unless the Supreme Council decides to pursue a doctrine of de-escalation. [Deccan Herald]

    Additionally, control and administrative authority over these transnational Islamist militias lie with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a branch of the government that will likely remain immune to Pezeshkian’s desired reforms if the regime wishes to maintain its current anti-Western, anti-Zionist grand strategies.

    The hard truth is that although this is a positive sign for the possible future of Iran and reflects the popular desire for modernizing change, the role of president is supervised and heavily influenced by the Supreme Leader and his council. If warming relations and expanding diplomatic ties with the U.S. and its allies are not part of the regime’s agenda, it will be virtually impossible for Pezeshkian to implement any significant changes. Despite the moderation and positive reforms he may champion, it remains unlikely that the Islamic Republic will stray far from its anti-Western theocratic principles.

  • Hungarian PM Controversially Pushes Ceasefire with Visits to Kyiv and Moscow

    07/06 – International News Story & Updates

    Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to consider a ceasefire with Russia on July 2, making a trip to Moscow days later. 

    Orbán’s proposal to Ukraine came shortly after Hungary a​​sumed the six-month rotating presidency of the European Council on July 1.

    The surprise visit to Kyiv was the president’s first visit in over a decade. [BBC]

    In the past, the Hungarian prime minister has criticized the decision to send Western military aid to Ukraine following Russia’s full scale invasion of the eastern European country in February 2022. 

    Orbán’s relationship with Russian president Vladimir Putin is also one of the warmest among EU leaders. 

    Orbán’s push for a ceasefire comes ahead of a planned international summit in Kyiv later this year.

    The Hungarian president said: “A ceasefire connected to a deadline would give a chance to speed up peace talks. I explored this possibility with the president and I am grateful for his honest answers and negotiation,”

    Kyiv responded with its own plans for peace including the plan for an international summit that could invite a Russian representative to help facilitate peace talks. 

    Ukrainian foreign policy adviser Ihor Zhovkva said: “We say that Ukraine really wants peace for itself, this is logical… For this, we have a tool – the peace summit,” [Reuters]

    Tensions between Ukraine and Hungary have risen in recent years in the face of  Hungary’s continued peaceful relationship with Russia and opposition to many EU efforts to aid Kyiv.

    Despite this, Ukraine has continued to seek Hungary’s support due to its reliance on EU financial and military backing amid its ongoing war with Russia. 

    ORBÁN VISITS RUSSIA

    Later the same week, on July 5, Orbán met with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the situation in Ukraine.

    During the trip, Putin insisted that Ukraine withdraw its troops from regions that Moscow has annexed.

    Last month Putin made the same request, adding that Kyiv must agree to drop any plans of joining NATO.

    Kyiv rejected these requests. [Reuters 2]

    Putin also told Orbán of his expectations for Hungary to outline “the position of European partners” on Ukraine given its newly acquired leading position in the European Council.

    Orbán responded by saying: “The number of steps needed to end the war and bring about peace is many,” [Le Monde]

    The trip to Russia was heavily criticized by EU officials who said it threatened to undermine the EU’s stance on the Russia-Ukraine war. 

    The EU has consistently positioned itself against any Russian offensive. 

    European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen wrote on X: “Appeasement will not stop Putin.” [X]

    US press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre added that the visit to Russia “will not advance the cause of peace and is counterproductive to promoting Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence, 

    The visit to Moscow was the first by a European leader since 2022. [Barron’s/AFP]

    OPINION

    It is likely that Orbán views Hungary’s current tenure as the rotating president of the European Union as a political opportunity. He appears to want to maximize his role as liaison and elevate his international status, as well as that of his relatively small nation, by brokering an end to this prominent war. Orbán has even labeled his government’s foreign policy strategy of playing both sides in this conflict as their own “peace mission”. [Reuters]

    Orbán’s character and promoted alliances are noteworthy when considering his intentions and actions. He recently helped establish the new European Parliament right-wing alliance group “Patriots for Europe” alongside other right-wing party leaders throughout Europe. He has consistently maintained warm relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, notably throughout the war with Ukraine, and has been an outspoken supporter of former American President Donald Trump.

    As far-right parties gain popularity and make electoral advances across Europe, and with the possibility of a resurgent Trump presidency, Orbán recognizes the timely opportunity to leverage Hungary’s current role and power within the EU. His calls for a ceasefire might be seen as appeasement towards Russia, but from his perspective, they could serve to diminish the influence of liberal Europe and promote his anti-Ukraine aid and anti-immigration policies.

    Orbán consistently pushes for peace within his public rhetoric, and has maintained throughout the conflict that NATO’s weaponization and funding of Ukraine has only further exacerbated and extended the war and devastation. As one of the most vocal advocates against NATO expansion, Orbán has famously critiqued the alliance’s recent evolution as a promoter of military offense and pursuer of war, straying away from its founding principles of restraint, defense and peace. [Newsweek]

    From a broader context, the disagreement and critical rhetoric amongst European leaders since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war has exemplified the clear lack of unity and disaccord regarding the functional role of NATO and its purpose for the political future of Europe at large. 

    Orbán boasts of his government’s controversial political stance within Europe and likely sees this as the perfect political moment to position himself at the forefront of an emerging right-wing wave across the continent and beyond. Many EU leaders are aware of this, and skepticism regarding Orbán’s recent moves has been widespread. 

    – K.M./P.T.